Understanding Evidence

Understanding Evidence

Share this post

Understanding Evidence
Understanding Evidence
Relevancy -
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Relevancy -

General Admissibility, direct and indirect evidence, probative value, unfair prejudice, conditional relevancy.

Misty Ewegen's avatar
Misty Ewegen
May 16, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Understanding Evidence
Understanding Evidence
Relevancy -
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

FRE 402 (the General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence) states:

"Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise:

  • the United States Constitution;

  • a federal statute;

  • these rules; or

  • other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court.

Irrelevant evidence is not admissible.


In simple terms, this rule breaks down into two parts:

  1. All relevant evidence is admissible and

  2. All irrelevant evidence is inadmissible.

When you begin to analyze each piece of evidence you want to present to the court this is the first question you ask. Is it relevant?

If the evidence you want to offer is irrelevant, your analysis is over, it is inadmissible. There are no exceptions. You cannot bring it to light in court. You are done. Throw it in the bin.

If the evidence you hold is relevant, your analysis has just begun, because it may be admissible, so long as it does not fall into one of the exceptions governing admissibility. There are many exceptions to admissibility, most of them determined by the discretion of the judge.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Understanding Evidence to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Misty Ewegen
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More